Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 3541 - 3560 of 7,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
In Smith, the majority and the minority were united in their view that certain claims relating to military operations are not justiciable and escape the reach of Article 2 of the Convention altogether. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:42 am
I’m sorry to say that the Texas Court of Appeals just joined this small minority, in the April 9 Cummins v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm by Howard Knopf
The Board has rendered 14 decisions between 1999  and 2014 – all but one of which (now pending in the SCC in CBC v SODRAC) are “interim” TOTAL NUMBER OF TARIFFS CERTIFIED 74 This is an inflated number, and reflects a number of minor “redeterminations” and other less than significant events. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Edward A. Fallone
  While public ownership of professional sports teams is relatively rare in the United States, it is common overseas. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Impair the fundamental right of every parent to control the care and custody of such parent’s minor children, including but not limited to control over education, discipline, religious and moral instruction, health, medical care, welfare, place of habitation, counseling, and psychological and emotional well-being of such minor children as provided for under the laws of this state and of the United States . . . . [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
Vega further asserted that he has affirmative defenses under Article 13 of the Convention that would allow J.G.V. to remain in his custody in the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   It did not do so, for example, in its most recent ruling in a major gay rights case — the 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
The patent is United States Patent No. 6,992,218 (“the ’218 patent”), assigned to SCR Pharmatop. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:21 am by Steven Eversole
  Merger operates to keep a defendant from being twice convicted for the same conduct through an operation of the prohibition against double jeopardy in the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:37 pm
The cases were removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on diversity grounds. [read post]