Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 3541 - 3560 of 6,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 6:20 am by Jennifer González
” Comparing Justice Steven’s dissent in this case to Justice Scalia’s opinion of the court was a criminal procedure class staple! [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Edith Roberts
After a clerkship with Judge Jerre Stockton Williams on the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2008, 1:45 am
Sentencing Loss Amounts: "The district court erred in relying on Application Note 2(F)(v)(III) to calculate loss. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm by Josh Wright
The Statement states that “Congress passed the FTC Act to push back against the judiciary’s open-ended rule of reason for analyzing Sherman Act claims” and cites the Supreme Court’s opinion in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 10:30 am by Richard Hunt
They have no legal standing, but they have been used as the de facto standard by the Department of Justice and at least one district court. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
Last year, the Texas Supreme Court decided a case interpreting the Open Beaches Act, Severance v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 1:25 am
Smith, Alisa and Saks, Michael, The Case for Overturning Williams v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:34 am by Lyle Denniston
Judge Cacheris, in dismissing that count, relied upon the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm by Jeff Neuburger
The court did not mention the recent ruling of the European Court of Justice in SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court with briefs that they hope will help convince the justices to nix a California law targeting donors,” urging the court in 22 separate submissions to review Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
Bill, 34 AD3d 741 [2nd Dept. 2006], rev'd, 10 NY3d 550 [2008] [reversed on effective date of the amendment]; Williams v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:22 pm
Duffy in The Legal Intelligencer United States District Court Judge William Ditter, Jr. spent 3 pages describing the errors made in a post trial pleading by Puricelli  in McKenna v City of Philadelphia which included mispellings such as "plaintf", "mocong papers" , "attoreys, "Ubited States" and all sorts of other mistakes. [read post]