Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells" Results 3561 - 3580 of 4,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am by Jeff Gamso
 But it's also possible that they decided to shaft him on the nuisance charge even though there was no evidence to support it.As for the first part, well, in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:34 am
The court in T.D.W. threw out T.D.W.'s conviction, reasoning that "a well-founded belief in one's right to the allegedly stolen property constitutes a complete defense to a charge of theft", as per a prior court ruling in Thomas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in GSO RE Onshore LLC v Sapir ;2010 NY Slip Op 52138(U) ;Decided on November 24, 2010 ;Supreme Court, New York County ; Fried, J. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Brody, Inflation, Productivity, and the Total Offset Method of Calculating Damages for Lost Future Earnings, 49 U. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:06 pm by David Walk
Brody, Inflation, Productivity, and the Total Offset Method of Calculating Damages for Lost Future Earnings, 49 U. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Marino’s part caused Lopresti’s delay in commencing the underlying action (see Zumpano v Quinn, 6 NY3d at 673; Kamruddin v Desmond, 293 AD2d at 71 5). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by Rumpole
Well, it happens about once every two thousand years. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  InLopresti v Bamundo, Zwal & Schermerhorn, LLP, ;2010 NY Slip Op 33436(U); December 14, 2010; Judge: Martin Shulman we see a familiar problem. [read post]
“It’s not easy being green”: local incentives, preemption problems, and the market participation exception. 78 U. [read post]