Search for: "Abid v. Abid"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 3,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2008, 8:01 pm
US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
[Federal Register: April 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 68)][Rules and Regulations][Page 18944-18956]From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov][DOCID:fr08ap08-3] --------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a [DHS No. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:14 am
The case involves an otherwise law-abiding defendant who received a five-year sentence for receiving (via the internet) child pornography. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
Dist. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 8:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 10:35 am
Take a look at the juiciest part (with the charming military acronym "NMR" denoting "news media representative"):Failure to comply with these ground rules or the Presiding Officer’s instructions, could result in permanent expulsion from the courtroom area and may result in the removal of the parent news organization from further participation and could subject the (NMR) to criminal prosecution.By signing this document, an NMR is agreeing to abide by the… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:40 am
The case is titled Dell, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari today in the "Fantasy Baseball" case of CBC Distribution v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:56 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 1:57 am
" The case is titled BVS Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:26 pm
" In other words, the multi-billion dollar award, when framed as a dollar amount, rather than as a percentage of net wealth, could, after BMW v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 2:23 pm
"You can learn more about this case, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
"Just as foreigners should respect the letter of the law in this country, the United States should abide by its treaty obligations - not just at the federal level, but in state and local jurisdictions as well. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:16 pm
.*** I seriously think Wisconsin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:14 pm
In the first, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
" At a White House briefing, press secretary Dana Perino said President Bush was disappointed with the decision, but "we respect the court's decision and will abide by it. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:35 am
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
Justices Kennedy and Scalia in particular seemed indignant at the suggestion that they could ever be required to abide by a judgment of the ICJ, especially because that judgment was based on an interpretation of the Vienna Convention that the Court had rejected in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
The Supreme Court today released its opinion in Medellin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:10 am
The decision came in the case of Medellin v. [read post]
