Search for: "Auge v. Auge"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 8,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 2:49 pm
Around one in 400 school-age children has diabetes. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:28 pm
Hurrah for the Court of Appeal.Robin Miller is one of the 260,000 members of Worldmark, which is a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation owned by its members (including Robin) and that owns vacation timeshares. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 11:51 am
When a veritable hurricane strikes the city (as transpired in L.A. on November 11, 2011 -- a fact that I think should be subject to judicial notice), you can potentially sue the City when that wind blows down a tree into your house.So holds the Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 11:58 am
Talk about classy:"On May 24, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a putative class action against the defendant for failure to pay overtime wages, among other causes of action. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
Not a good day for the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm
From the statutory text, it seems that when Congress passed the IDEA, it wanted disabled students to be receive the same (or equivalent) education as nondisabled students. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 11:31 am
It's unclear to me which has sweetest retirement system: California public employees or California judges. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:05 pm
There's no downside -- and some potential upside -- of publishing this opinion. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
I kept reading this opinion expecting to find a dissent. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:46 pm
Sometimes you amend an opinion to respond to an argument in a petition for rehearing. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 4:55 pm
It's a case about Indian gaming. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:46 am
In a world with more internet access I'd do a quick study, but for now, I'll just pose the question:When an opinion begins by saying that a plaintiff "injured herself" (or himself) in a particular accident, does that tend to suggest that the Court of Appeal is going to find for the defendant? [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:53 pm
The Supreme Court held that you can't find a parent and subsidiary guilty of conspiracy under the Sherman Act because it's impossible for such entities to actually conspire. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:20 pm
I often mention that one of the downsides of filing an appeal of an adverse ruling in the trial court is that it may end up in a published opinion that publicizes things that you'd prefer remain unknown.That's exactly what transpired here. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 8:31 pm
Bad things can happen to you when you manufacture and sell counterfeit goods. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 12:27 pm
I could definitely have seen this case coming out the other way, but I also think that Justice Mauro's (unanimous) opinion is entirely plausible.It's just a statutory interpretation case. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
I've previously noted the Ninth Circuit's recent infatuation with the word "eponymous".Today the California Court of Appeal jumps on the bandwagon.I'm officially calling 2013 "The Eponymous Year". [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 11:25 am
I'm sorry. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:06 pm
Two questions about this opinion:(1) What's the relevant standard of proof? [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:52 pm
It at first seemed a little harsh to me that the California State Board of Pharmacy revoked Andrew Sternberg's pharmacy license just because he was the pharmacist in charge when someone else stole some drugs from the office. [read post]
