Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 3561 - 3580 of 14,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
” The refusal to cooperate is a matter of stated policy. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Colleen V. Chien
For example, in Engquist v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:17 pm by The Law Blogger
In District of Columbia v Heller, decided in 2008, SCOTUS recognized for the first time an individual's right to bear arms in self defense.Nearly 10-years ago to the day, we predicted that the 2nd Amendment cases yet to be decided that term would inure to the benefit of gun owners; we were correct. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
The committee will hear testimony from David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs, and Christopher A. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
However, the recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek in case C-702/18, Primart Marek Łukasiewicz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 10:53 am by Amy Howe
The gun owners argued that the rule violated their right to “keep and bear arms” under the Constitution’s Second Amendment. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:21 am by Edith Roberts
” For the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky previews New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]