Search for: "Case v. People" Results 3561 - 3580 of 51,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2008, 9:55 pm
n People v Hunter (6/12/08) a unanimous Court of Appeals held that in a sex case, where the defense was consent, it was a Brady violation requiring reversal for the prosecutor to withhold from the defense information that in another pending case the same complainant has accused a man of rape and his claim was that the sex had been consensual. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am by Lyle Denniston
  If that change shuts out the legislature, more  or less entirely, that could be a constitutional problem, or so it appeared during the argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
In the recent case of London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary [2011] EWHC 413 (COP) the issue of media access to Court of Protection proceedings arose for determination. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
An eyewitness reported that one of the people involved was a dreadlocked Black man. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
PM, R (on the application of) v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2056 (Admin) (04 August 2010) – Read judgment Some people get to a certain age and stop counting. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In a judgment delivered on 22 February 2018 in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J ordered Channel 5 to pay £20,000 in damages for misuse of private information to a couple, Shakir Ali and Shahida Aslam, who had fallen into rent arears. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
The Recording Industry vs. the People blog reports: In the Minnesota case Capitol Records v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 11:57 am
A lawyer I know is researching cases in which the RIAA sued the wrong party (which is most of the cases, as near as I can tell), and then had to withdraw its claim against that party.I sent him a partial list of cases off the top of my head where I believe that was the case:Arista v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]