Search for: "Doe VI" Results 3561 - 3580 of 5,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 3:13 am by Lana Ulrich
The national injunction as an equitable remedy is a recent phenomenon; an injunction typically restrains a defendant’s conduct vis-à-vis the plaintiff, not vis-à-vis the world. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
Moreover, the statement he made to the police during his pre-trial detention was not the sole basis for his conviction, and he had had the opportunity of challenging the prosecution's allegations under conditions which did not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:43 am by Shannon O'Hare
The Italian legislature has also clarified that such assets segregation shall be enforceable vis-à-vis third parties, including in case of insolvency of the borrower, strengthening the protections provided in favour of the SPV – and therefore the buyer. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:49 am by Brian Finucane
The assessment of whether territory is occupied is an objective one and does not rest on the subjective belief of parties to the conflict. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:57 am by Peter Mahler
See ASA Business Valuation Standards BVS-VI, Part IV; Statements on ASA Business Valuation Standards, SBVS-1, Part VI, SBVS-2, Part VI; ASA Procedural Guidelines PG-2. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:04 pm by V.D.RAO
So far as the action of secured creditor is concerned, the Debts Recovery Tribunal exercises the jurisdiction of superintendence under sub-section (3) of Section 17, to see that the secured creditor acts only in accordance with the provisions of the said Act and the rules framed thereunder, to enforce its security interest and that it neither does exceed its jurisdiction nor acts in breach or non-compliance with the provisions of the said Act and the rules thereunder. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
For starters, surely the emergency rehousing would be effected under Part VI Housing Act 1996 not Part VII. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 10:18 pm
Third, on the issue that the sentence imposed by the court was an improper departure from the guidelines: A review of the sentencing court's departure above Category VI necessitates a three-step analysis. [read post]
29 May 2010, 3:57 am by Durga Rao
The conduct, thus, complained of must be such so as to oppress a minority of the members including the petitioners vis- [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm by Giles Peaker
As will be clear,  P (A Child: Use of S.20 CA 1989) [2014] EWFC 775 is a family law case, but one which crosses with housing law. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The DOI explained that ICWA requirements would apply to an action that may result in one of the placement outcomes, even if it ultimately does not. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Yet the wording does not seem to give a clear answer. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
”  The Divisional Court reasoned that the lienholders had not given notice to the owner of their claim but that “there is no time limit in the Act for giving written notice of a lien to an owner, so any notice before actual payment would suffice to create security against the full unpaid amount vis-a vis the owner. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Thus, we hold 2 Florida exempts itself from the age-old axiom: “The act does not make a person guilty unless the mind be also guilty. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
  Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule. [7]            The FCC also clarified and strengthened its requirement that ISPs operate with transparency [8]so that both retail broadband subscribers and upstream carriers and sources of content understand the manner in which they can acquire broadband services. [9]  However the FCC specified that its Internet access requirements only apply to the… [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
On Sept. 13, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled that the United Kingdom’s bulk data-collection programs violate human-rights law by failing to incorporate adequate privacy safeguards and oversight—but that mass surveillance and intelligence sharing did not violate international law. [read post]