Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 20,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 6:50 am
Cheramie v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 4:31 am
I have spoken on numerous occasions with North Carolina Deputy Attorney General Thomas Pittman (919-716-6500), who has been lead counsel in all of their litigation, about the BIS monitor, and he wholeheartedly endorses the use of this monitor. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 11:46 am
The district court instructed the jury that an activity was generally not work if it did not entail some kind of “exertion,” either physical or mental - a definition derived from the Supreme Court’s decision in Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:26 am
The Court noted that Attorney General opinions are not binding on the courts, and disagreed with the Attorney General’s analysis that the statute only confers peace officer status on custodial deputies while performing those duties. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:16 pm
Herrilka v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Messer, Angela Messer, Debtors Daren Messer & Angela Messer v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 7:33 am
In the case, State Farm Lloyd's v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:35 am
The case is entitled Koplowitz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
No attorneys’ fees: Plaintiffs also say that the fact that the arbitration clause does not provide prevailing plaintiffs an opportunity to recover fees makes it unconscionable. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:31 am
Attorney General, 2009 Westlaw 524714 (March 3, 2009). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:39 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Thursday struck down California’s requirement that charities and nonprofits operating in the state provide the state attorney general’s office with the names and addresses of their largest donors. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 12:46 pm
The Private Attorneys’ General Act (PAGA) continued to make news this week as a decision from the California Supreme Court — amongst other holdings — determined that the Legislature’s overall PAGA design exempted public entities from its enforcement (Stone v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:57 pm
Whereas in 1967, in Klarkowski v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:30 am
[COMMONWEALTH v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:54 am
My partner, Attorney Tim Foley, and I were again successful in securing a summary judgment, this time in favor of State Farm in the somewhat novel Pike County Court of Common Pleas case of Adragna v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:44 am
"Generalized apprehension, nervousness, feeling aggravated or hassled, i.e., psychological distress from vexing but nonphysical intercourse, when there is no threat of imminent serious physical harm, does not rise to the level of fear of imminent serious physical harm. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am
The standard in Smith was that a generally applicable law that does not target a specific religious practice does not violate the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:31 pm
Scheiner, Attorneys for the Injured, at 1-800-646-1210. [read post]
