Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 3561 - 3580 of 12,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
This had been settled law since Doe d. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 6:51 am
G, 112 Stat. 2681-761 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O. 12048 of March 27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168; Pub. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:13 am by Jan von Hein
Schack: Does Art. 27 Lugano Convention permit requiring a special legitimate interest in actions for negative declaratory relief? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As seen [above], process variant (b) [of claim 1] of the second auxiliary request does not comply with the requirement of novelty pursuant to A 54(1) and A 54(3) with respect to the prior but post-published document D1 […]. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  The government declined to intervene, id. at *1, meaning:  (1) that it thought the suit not worth pursuing, and (2) the relator was free to pursue whatever allegations he wanted. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:13 am by Samantha Fry
John Does 1-10 et al (3:20-cv-01161) On July 17, Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum brought suit in the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Re), 1998 CanLII 837 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27, at para. 21; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:10 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
North Carolina does not require registration or license to serve Process in North Carolina. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:22 pm
In Bill C-60 (clause 27, new subsection 34.02(1)) anti-circumvention penalties required that circumvention be for the commercial purpose of infringing copyright, for example reproduction or communication of the work, whereas Bill C-61 (clause 31-new subsection 41.1(1)) prohibits circumvention in general and does not require infringement of an economic right in the work (thus circumvention alone is deemed an infringement). [read post]