Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 9,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 11:26 am
For example, in Livingston v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
Circuit Court of Appeals (English v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Tamiz marginalises Godfrey v Demon Internet, the original English internet defamation case decided in 1999. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am
Owens v Owens was heard on 17 May 2018. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am
” See Engalla v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:33 am
In this post, Grant Arnold, a paralegal in the litigation team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Unger and Anor (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and Anor. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:46 pm
Such conclusion would not change whether it is under Indian Law or English Law. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:44 pm
The interests of people in the Indian sub continent are involved and therefore parties cannot be allowed to decide the dispute based on English laws (the agreed law for settlement of dispute). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:41 am
The Opinion can be consulted here (no English version yet). [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
Brown v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 2:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, Ramsameachire v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
As a consequence, Munby J’s decision in Mubarak v Mubarak (No.1) [2001] 1 F.L.R. 673 has been overruled and W v H (Family Division: Without Notice Orders) [2001] 1 All E.R. 300 is overruled in part. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
” Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/229665? [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am
Bonus question for students: Has the passing of the Human Rights Act 1998 changed the approach of the English judiciary to the interpretation of statutes? [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am
Bonus question for students: Has the passing of the Human Rights Act 1998 changed the approach of the English judiciary to the interpretation of statutes? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v The Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan is arguably a case which has been waiting to happen for years. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm
In Bright v. $99 Only Store and Home Depot USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
The case has attracted some media attention in light of recent suggestions that English law, particularly libel law, is being abused by wealthier males to silence female accusers. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
They look a little different, but the Dutch Supreme Courtsays that they should be treated just the same Yesterday afternoon, the AmeriKat's Dutch friend, Professor Tobias Cohen Jehoram (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek) sent her, hot of the press, a copy of the Dutch Supreme Court's decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Teva delivered yesterday morning. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
