Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 11,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 8:34 am
That also means that considering how it might pan out under English law is pretty speculative, but it does serve to illustrate some important points of copyright law.The story is about the family of a playwright (a Pullitzer Prize winner, Paul Zindel) suing several parties concerned with the film The Shape of Water. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
In Rubin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
First, he mentions the US Supreme Court’s “with all deliberate speed” language from what has become known as Brown II, the Court’s follow-up to its groundbreaking Brown v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Bradford v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:10 am
Meanwhile Lord Hughes examined the public policy reasons why English law does not recognise a duty of care owed in tort by the police to individual citizens, and therefore concluded that, as it is undesirable to permit detailed review of a particular criminal investigation by way of the ECHR, the positive obligation should be confined to structural failings. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:18 pm
The German Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Rechtsdurchsetzung in sozialen Netzwerken (Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz) (literally: Law on the improvement of law enforcement in social networks and known as ‘NetzDG’) has attracted much media attention, e.g. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:18 am
Jorge Contreras: TCL v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
Although the German principle of deliberate selection or the US disclosure-dedication doctrine have not entered into English patent law, the Court is scrutinizing the language of the specification with renewed vigor following Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 1:28 pm
The abstract to the article states: In the recent case of Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Canadian case: Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:18 am
Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:21 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am
Sari and Nasu’s argument is predicated on the fact that Article V of the treaty does not expressly require a request or advance consultation for the exercise of collective self-defense, and that a related 1960 exchange of notes (also available in English) expressly exempts operations conducted under Article V from requirements for “prior consultation” that otherwise apply to major changes in the presence of U.S. troops, equipment, or facilities in… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
The court is hearing the case of McCoy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Bergeron v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
The online English-language article was, however, read by at least 200 people in Canada. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 11:20 am
., Thompson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
