Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 3561 - 3580 of 16,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 6:41 pm by Norma Duenas
Those three exceptions allow “the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding— (i) for the establishment of paternity; … (iii) concerning child custody or visitation; … (v) regarding domestic violence . . . [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:42 am by Chris Castle
Supreme Court that I haven’t paid too much attention to–but suddenly realized it’s something we should all care about because it could set precedent for fair use cases for decades to come:  Google v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:48 pm by Tom Zagorsky
Supreme Court decided to hear an appeal of a Ninth Circuit case, SEC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 am by Ben
The case is Nirvana LLC v Marc Jacobs International LLC et al. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Tribunal justified this distinction by referring to a number of B.C. cases, Mailloux v Tofino (District) at para 111, and Whistler (Resort Municipality) v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Data Matters Blog has a post suggesting that British Airways and Marriot International may potentially avoid GDPR fines. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
  The European Commission, on the other hand, has a more flexible toolkit and can impose a civil fine, such as Google’s €2.4 billion fine - which even they must feel in their balance sheet! [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Two years ago, in Honeycutt v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:03 am by Florian Mueller
Nijhof explained to what extent courts in other jurisdictions do or do not believe that Huawei v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Germany The German data protection regulator has issued a fine of €14.5m. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Appeals Criminal Law: Delay; YouthR. v. [read post]