Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2020, 2:51 pm
Jackson, Sacramento County Superior Court case # 34-2017-00219410. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Because all three plaintiffs have standing to sue and satisfy the strictures of Rule 23, the Court grants the plaintiffs' motion for class certification with a modified class definition.BACKGROUNDThis litigation arises out of efforts to collect student loan debts. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:03 am
Thankfully, the Court is not faced with such a stark choice, nor must the Court strike an equitable balance of rights all on its own. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:04 am
Bruno, et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:38 am
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Superior Court of California, a case decided in 2017 and heavily relied on by Ford. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:10 am
Superior Court (2003) 111 CA4th 923,930 (pdf), and Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:48 am
Jessica Gossett v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
In Corra v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
The Court affirmed the superior court’s action in remanding the case for trial. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:47 pm
Factual Background In White v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:54 am
I blogged a couple of days ago about the important case of R v Rogers, 2016 ONSC 70 (Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Ontario court provides clear guidance on privacy and "tower dumps" in R v Rogers and Telus). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 7:24 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reversed, and the Supreme Court granted review. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Patino, supra.The prosecution appealed the judge’s granting the motions, which raised several issues. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
” Vaquero v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
The Supreme Court citing Central State Hosp. v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
But important to clarify the situations when a superior court may depart from a prior judgment of a court of coordinate jurisdiction; the standard is not that the prior decision was “plainly wrong”; a superior court judge in first instance should follow prior decisions made by their own court on all questions of law, including questions of constitutional law, unless one or more of the exceptions in Spruce Mills are met. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
Following a decision by the Arizona Supreme Court that the Appointment System was permissible under Arizona law, the district court reaffirmed its grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Cicon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:04 am
After a trial, the Superior Court judge found that Mr. [read post]
