Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 4,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
The coconspirators abused their position as government credit card holders by placing fraudulent orders with suppliers and all coconspirators personally benefited from the scheme by receiving kickbacks in cash and merchandise. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
The coconspirators abused their position as government credit card holders by placing fraudulent orders with suppliers and all coconspirators personally benefited from the scheme by receiving kickbacks in cash and merchandise. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am
In Purcell v Ireland, the Commission (in an admissibility decision) upheld a reporting ban on Sinn Fein accepting – as with the majority in Holder - apparently somewhat speculative justifications for the ban. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:07 am
” Grokster, 545 U.S. at 919.However, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected Viacom's claim that Google's site was liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
United States, 556 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm
Wouldn’t there be a U.S. interest in deterring such fraud, reducing private enforcement costs within the United States? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:44 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently decided an important case for non-citizens, lawfully present in the United State, with multiple simple drug possession convictions. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm
On June 21, in one of its last decisions of the term, Holder v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:43 pm
In the 2001 case of State Farm v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am
The Applicants then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am
require registrants for usTLDs to have a substantial nexus with the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
