Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 3561 - 3580 of 10,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
’ Id.Specifically addressing the child pornography guidelines, Judge James L. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:14 am by Russ Bensing
Ice had implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
That office then turned the information over to Officer James Schrimpsher of the Algona Police Department.Schrimpsher verified that Dreyer lived in Algona based on property and utility records. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 2:49 am by Bystander
In addition, there were a number of allegations made against him, which, as Mr James on his behalf points out, had not been proved. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:36 am by by PritzkerLaw
Virtually every health department, federal, state and local, recommends against its use. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:39 am
Opponents of the death penalty in many other states, and in Congress, have been floating similar legislation since 1987, when the Supreme Court handed down an influential decision in a case known as McCleskey v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"] A nice formulation in a concurring opinion by Oregon Court of Appeals Judge Bronson James, in a case about the Oregon crime of "interfering with a peace officer" (State v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:00 am by Walter Olson
Western Southern Financial Group Inc.; Chiodi] A request from blogger Coyote: he’s looking to interview folks who run 10-40 employee firms [details] “Massachusetts is just one of six states that prohibit employers from donating to candidates while allowing unions to donate,” and the only one that prohibits employers from administering a PAC [Paul Craney and James Manley, Commonwealth Magazine] California voters sought to fix gerrymandering in races for… [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
Bryan James Gardner was indicted on one count of possession of child pornography” in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting and unusual choice of law problem, on which New York’s highest court split 4-2-1 yesterday in In the Matter of Holmes v. [read post]