Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 6,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2014, 12:38 pm
It was held in Dunne v Dunne, Rispoli v Rispoli and Davis v Davis that the issue of cruel and inhuman treatment determination will not be lightly overturned on appeal. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Co., 320 N.W.2d 927 (S.D. 1982); Davis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:00 pm
Davis and People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm
In 2010, UC Davis studied 18 drug sniffing police dogs and their handlers. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
In LNSU#1, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
Plaintiffs hoped it would eliminate the need for the difficult proof described in Davis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
Davis. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
The judgment in the Court of Appeal was given by Nicola Davies LJ, with whom McCombe and Coulson LJJ agreed. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
This is the Court’s first exclusionary rule case since Davis v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:44 am
The case is Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:27 pm
Our firm recently published an advisory on this new law in Maine (see the Davis Wright Tremaine advisory here) which prohibits all direct marketing to minors under the age of 18, with no exceptions. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
The case is Timothy Davis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
The case is Timothy Davis v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
Davis, 454 U.S. 370 (1982) (per curiam) (upholding a forty-year sentence for possession of nine ounces of marijuana with the intent to distribute); Rummel v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
It's exactly the kind of alternative that law professor John Culhane thought was available.DOMA - Gill v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm
Perhaps most relevant is this in-chambers opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Lux v. [read post]
