Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 3561 - 3580 of 6,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Recent Court Decisions on Resource Extraction & Shareholder Proposal Rules Here is a blog from Davis Polk's Ning Chiu: The D.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
Know of any media law events happening in the next few months? [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:36 pm by Peter Tillers
 But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:55 am by WSLL
Davis, Judge.Representing the Public Service Commission of Wyoming: Gregory A. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:06 am by Andrew Trask
One plaintiff attorney-scholar group (Joshua Davis, Eric Cramer, and Caitlin May) says "yes." [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:50 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: WENDY WILLIS, f/k/a WENDY DAVIS v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Therefore, our statement in Davis—that Broughton and Cruz prohibit the arbitration of public injunctive relief claims in California—is no longer good law. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:21 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF: MC, HC and CC, Minor Children, DL, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Novak, University of Michigan Jane Dailey, University of Chicago From Illegal Aliens to Illegal History: A Roundtable Responds to the Return of the Culture Wars in Arizona Chair: Lorena Oropeza, University of California, Davis Lydia Otero, University of Arizona Miroslava Chavez-Garcia, University of California, Davis Milo Alvarez, Bard College at Simon’s Rock Karen Leong, Arizona State University at the Tempe CampusAge Matters: Chronological Age and the… [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:57 am
The court also noted that "due process does not require a hearing . . . until the employee has raised a genuine dispute on [the] operative facts", citing Davis v Westchester County, 42 AD3 79 (appeal dismissed 9 NY3d 953) . [read post]