Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3561 - 3580 of 8,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
” The brief lays out all of the party’s arguments in the case advocating why the lower court decision was right or wrong. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:20 pm by CJLF Staff
Discretion for Judges Sentencing Juvenile Offenders: SF 448, a bill passed by the Iowa Senate, gives judges "wide discretion" in the sentencing of persons under the age of 18, to comply with the US Supreme Court's ruling in Miller v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:59 pm by J. Ross Pepper
In a recent breach of contract case before the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Premier Imaging/Medical Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:05 am
In the meantime, the coffee must be swilled, the robes must be resplendent, the judicial wisdom must be closely rationed and dispensed only in small doses and only on Wednesdays and -- oh yeah -- Judge Schwartz must on occasion dissent:Prebkevitz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:39 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Paying for Dropped Calls Every Month: Thank the Supreme Court and its 2010 Term - Washington, DC lawyer Steven Berk on his blog, The Corporate Observer UPDATE: Apple v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Google Fight Continues – Seattle attorney Stacia Lay of Hendricks & Lewis on her blog, IP Law Chat Tempted to Use a Summer Intern- Think Again – Arden Hills, Minnesota lawyer Marylee Abrams of Abrams & Schmidt on the firm’s Minnesota Labor & Employment Law Blog Forensic Accounting and Divorce – Ontario attorney Brian Galbraith on his Ontario Family Law Blog Terms of Service and Employee Social Media Passwords – Toronto… [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
  In particular, we will discuss the Chancery Court opinion in City of Westland v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:17 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Understand the Law This issue is well beyond the ability of a lay person to understand on an intuitive basis. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm by Mark Bennett
*The irony is that, under the last administration, Chuck Rosenthal set Curry aside to argue before the Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:30 am by Joe Palazzolo
He cited a passage from the the Supreme Court’s 1853 decision in O’Reilly v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:34 am by Bob Kelley
“Being in court” may mean something different to a lay juror than it does to a lawyer or a judge. [read post]