Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 21,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
” This would mean that Federal Express, for example, would be liable for continuing to deliver packages to MindGeek’s address or that a waste-management company could be liable for providing custodial services to the building where MindGeek has an office. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:22 am
The loss of chance doctrine is a legal principle that allows a plaintiff to obtain damages from a defendant for a heightened risk of death or injury, even if the plaintiff cannot show by a preponderance of the evidence that the ultimate injury was caused by the defendant’s negligence. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
Like most courts to consider the issue, the California Supreme Court in a case involving Domino’s Pizza has held that a franchisor generally cannot be held liable for the independently made employment decisions of one of its franchisees. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:30 pm
Put another way, if it is 51% likely that the defendant committed the alleged act, he is liable. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:51 am
Talk to a Capable Syracuse Medical Malpractice Attorney to Discuss Your Case It is not uncommon for multiple parties to be deemed liable for a plaintiff’s harm in a medical malpractice action. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:34 am
Florida’s abolition of joint and several liability means that a defendant will not have to pay a share of the damages that is greater than their share of the fault. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
That’s the issue in Murphy-Hylton v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:34 am
Florida’s abolition of joint and several liability means that a defendant will not have to pay a share of the damages that is greater than their share of the fault. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:34 am
Florida’s abolition of joint and several liability means that a defendant will not have to pay a share of the damages that is greater than their share of the fault. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:20 pm
Consequently, summary judgment was granted in favor of the defendant. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:29 am
The defendants in the Buckhead Community Bank case did indeed move to dismiss the FDIC ‘s ordinary negligence claims against them, arguing that bank directors cannot be held liable for ordinary negligence under Georgia’s business judgment rule. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:29 am
The defendants in the Buckhead Community Bank case did indeed move to dismiss the FDIC ‘s ordinary negligence claims against them, arguing that bank directors cannot be held liable for ordinary negligence under Georgia’s business judgment rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:51 pm
Another relevant issue is the defendant’s role regarding the sport. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:43 am
The jury could still ultimately find it was the plaintiff’s negligence, rather than the defendant’s failure to warn, that was responsible for her injuries. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
Given her earlier findings on the limited consent, the judge wasted little time in concluding that other than in the six week period of the VCGC the defendants were also liable for passing off in 2008, 2009 and 2010. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:44 pm
As a result, the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant was affirmed, and the plaintiff’s lawsuit was dismissed. [read post]
3 May 2009, 5:43 pm
The court ruled that an insurer cannot defend a claim of which it has no knowledge and that, “The insurer’s duty to defend simply does not arise until it receives the foundational information designated in the notice requirement. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:07 pm
The remaining causes of action sought to hold Defendants liable for Defendant Krupa's deception because they knew or should have known that he was untrustworthy. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:07 pm
The remaining causes of action sought to hold Defendants liable for Defendant Krupa's deception because they knew or should have known that he was untrustworthy. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:56 pm
This means that even though jointly liable defendants in a tort case are each on the hook to the plaintiff for as much as 100% of the economic damages (until the plaintiff has been 100% compensated for that portion of the judgment), the defendant who is 2% liable but pays 100% of the judgment is entitled to recover the remaining 98% from the other liable defendants. [read post]
