Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 3561 - 3580 of 5,594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit invalidated an Illinois law barring most people from publicly carrying loaded guns in Moore v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
Relying on Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC, the defendants contend that, because the plaintiff, an undocumented alien who is ineligible for employment in this country, submitted false documentation when he was hired by City Wide, he was not entitled to any damages for lost wages. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Robert Wilson President & CEO, WorkersCompensation.com, LLC www.workerscompensation.com Blog: From Bob’s Cluttered Desk Related Articles: I Saw The Future Of Workers’ Comp Today Workers’ Comp 20/20: Tethered by Wireless – The Future Office Without Walls Become a “Tech Translator”: National Unemployment Rate for Technology Jobs Is 3.3% MYTH #5: Because FECA Is So Different From State Workers’ Compensation Systems, Private Sector Case Management… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 9:29 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The nurse will scan the bar code on the medication, the nurse's own badge is scanned, the patient's bar code is scanned and the system then confirms "this is the correct medication, patient and dosage that should be given at this time," essentially giving the nurse a green light to proceed. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
But does Concepcion bar any state-created legislation that might limit arbitration, even in circumstances where, as in Broughton and Cruz, public health and safety are implicated? [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  The defendant in State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am by Jack Goldsmith
  For if the bar for ending an armed conflict is lower than the bar for initiating or engaging in armed conflict, then one would be starting and stopping armed conflicts endlessly. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:04 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held a Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
In the case at bar, a review of the record reveals no proof that defendant American contracted for the work at issue or that it had any notice whatsoever that plaintiff was on its premises until after the accident. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
In the case at bar, a review of the record reveals no proof that defendant American contracted for the work at issue or that it had any notice whatsoever that plaintiff was on its premises until after the accident. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:28 pm
Geithner, asking the Fourth Circuit--which had previously rejected this challenge to the Affordable Care Act on the ground that it was barred by the Tax Anti Injunction Act--to consider the case again in light of the June ruling upholding the ACA. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:55 am by Brendan Kevenides
 Though not a bike lighting case, the First District Appellate Court (Chicago is in the First District) considered this issue in Savage v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am by 1 Crown Office Row
He clearly and explicitly stated that outright withdrawal from the Convention was one of the options he was considering – the first time I have heard a sitting Lord Chancellor float this possibility. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 10:28 pm by Leland E. Beck
Geithner, vacated its denial of certiorari, granted certiorari, vacated the judgment below, and remanded the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for consideration of the plaintiffs’ claims in light of the Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]