Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 3561 - 3580
of 13,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2019, 6:11 am
Notably, Annex B divides the appendices into two categories—those “that may be amended only by board agreement” and those “which the directors, NSA and GCHQ, may change or interpret by mutual agreement. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 5:56 am
In 2018, Plaintiffs filed 403 new federal securities class actions, which was a 2% decrease from 2017 but still nearly double the average of annual filings from 1997-2017. [1] The 2018 filings included more than 180 cases challenging disclosures made in connection with mergers and acquisitions (M&A filings) and the fifth-highest number of “core” filings (excluding M&A filings) on record. [2] As depicted in Figure 1 below, the number of filings… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
Lammers, Putnam County Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellant State of Ohio Carly M. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Nathan B. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
B. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
ER attending Michael B. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
As a result, the Court could not classify it as either plastic or textile on the basis of GRI 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 10:03 am
Para. 65 says “Kangaroo owns the copyright in: a. the design of the emoji beach balls (Ex. 1); and b. the photographs used to advertise the emoji beach balls (Ex 2). [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:52 am
March was the least active month in Q1 2019 for M&A+I events with two known events. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:30 am
For stаte, federal аuditors, their mаin goаl is to аdd revenue аnd this might indicаte to meet their goаl, they’ll bring every trick out of the bаg. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:04 pm
(Liverpool Properties Ltd v Oldbridge Investments Ltd (1985) 2 EGLR 111 and Sambrin Investments Ltd v Taborn (1990) 1 EGLR 61 ). [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm
” There is a lot to unpack here and I’m still sifting through the Tally report. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
B. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:36 am
En resumen, y aquí está la doctrina jurisprudencial definitiva: Procede fijar la siguiente interpretación de los preceptos legales concernidos en este litigio: 1º) Los artículos 107.1 y 107.2 a) del TRLHL, a tenor de la interpretación que hemos hecho del fallo y del fundamento jurídico 5 de la STC 59/2017, adolecen solo de una inconstitucionalidad y nulidad parcial. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:52 am
§§ 541(b)(5)(C), 541(b)(6)(C), 541(b)(10)(C). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:25 am
Read, No. 17-10439 (3-14-19)(Hawkins with M. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:04 pm
Done in Washington, DC.Carmen M. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" 1 id. at App. 34. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm
§ 2707(b). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm
However, the three SEP-specific motions in limine (#1, #3, #4) have been denied or deferred. [read post]
