Search for: "People v. Finely"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 5,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Permits continue to be required for longer work periods without a day of rest Incorporate firefighter hours of work provisions in part II and regulations, but maintain current provisions Introduction of two new leave provisions: organ donation (maximum 26 weeks), and to attend citizenship ceremonies (1 day) Require four weeks of notice to commence or return from all leaves Allow the accruing of service, to a maximum of 52 weeks, for nomination/election leave (currently exists for maternity,… [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
In a recent case entitled People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Note that registration was being proposed for lots of things at the time—land, design, copyright for works of fine art. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am
B.B. was stabbed in his back and flank, but he was otherwise fine. . . . [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
In Promatek v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Silicon Valley v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
Pacheco, SJC-11216, Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
[Finely] textured lean beef. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
This was from a survey that didn’t ask about law; it just asked about people’s problems. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
Bork was arguing that the harm caused by the use of contraception and the harm caused by air pollution were ultimately of the same sort, that it was legitimate to ban pollution hence legitimate to ban contraception—his article was in part an attack on Griswold v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 8:10 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 10:59 pm
So we have a key ongoing internal project v. new client project. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
In the old days, the guy would have pulled out a huge paper map -- potentially blocking his view -- and been fine. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
People carrying out transactions in U.K. markets need to have confidence that they are operating on a level-playing field with everyone else. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
After all, the purpose of the fence, just like the windshield here, was in part to keep unwanted people and things out. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: 'Gideon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:23 am
Specifically, in People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
These are not “fines” for those who break the rules or fail to join a regulator. [read post]
