Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 14,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2015, 5:14 am
Fairhaven Country Estate- sourceOn 8 July 2015 the Western Cape High Court handed down its decision in the Fairhaven Country Estate v Shaun Harris matter. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:46 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
Mousai v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:57 am
However, the Court did not leave excluded people hanging. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:30 am
Florida (08-7621) as improvidently granted, in this per curiam opinion. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:52 am
The Plaintiff Was in the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time and Suffered Serious Injuries as a Result The plaintiff in the case of Pittman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:26 pm
People make their spouses their agents in power of attorney all the time. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Today, prosecutors in death cases still employ various tools to prevent Black people from serving on juries. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 11:00 pm
As a general rule, under the Regulation individuals should not be subject to decision-making measures based solely on profiling, when such measures produce ‘legal effects’ on them (e.g. a bank decides not to grant a mortgage on the basis of profiling information), or significantly affect them. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 11:23 am
” The general rule, found in Scholes v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
Therefore, in a jury trial, upon the request of the defendant, who faces a loss of liberty if convicted, the people must be granted the right to speak to the validity of laws as well as the facts of the case. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:19 am
(Of course, many thought the same thing about NFIB v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:35 am
Stephon Walter v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
On the Fifth Circuit, it takes nine hands to grant review. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
According to extensive focus-group testing, the words people most closely associate with Relist Watch are “dull” and “rote. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 1:45 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Court remanded the case of People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:58 am
Cazares (Gabe) v. [read post]
