Search for: "People v. New"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 41,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2007, 1:22 am
City of New York Subscription Required
NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice
Video of Defendant's Interview Played for Grand Jury Is Found Prejudicial; Indictment Is Dismissed
People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm
In People v Colville (2010 NY Slip Op 07185 [2nd Dept. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
Supreme Court ruled that people have a right under the First Amendment to bun the U.S. flag, the same freedom of expression apparently doesn’t exist in New Jersey. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:36 am
Banister v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
“This procedure must be followed even if the plea agreement contains a provision for a specific amount of restitution” (People v Morrishill, 127 AD3d at 994). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
Clarendon I
NEW YORK COUNTYContracts
Court Finds Reasonable Suspicion to Stop Defendant, Probable Cause for Subsequent Arrest
People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 2:20 pm
Frey (Treaty Rights) Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:05 pm
The Mirror Group phone hacking litigation has had a much lower profile than that brought in relation to phone hacking at the News of the World. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:48 am
When any enforcement officer encounters a situation in which there will be “First Amendment activity”– that is, people speaking out — it would be “legitimate” for them to take what people say into account in deciding whether to make an arrest, the government lawyer suggested. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:12 am
"I've got good news! [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 am
White wrote for the majority in a 1977 case, Patterson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:25 pm
In Cohen v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:49 am
For those who can't get enough of Batson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
In IRAP v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
Gideon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:28 am
But in this case the Second Circuit reverses because the judge did not ask questions that would determine if potential jurors held any preconcieved notions about criminal gangs.The case is United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:30 am
One of my favorites concerned the 1953 California appellate court case, Banks v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 pm
As detailed in this official press release and this local news report, a "134-year prison sentence for a man who tied up four people while ransacking their German Village-area homes does not violate the U.S. constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled this morning. [read post]
