Search for: "People v. Waits"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 5,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 3:36 am
I’d discuss the issues in more detail, but we’ll wait until the Supreme Court decides this, because it surely will. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:01 am
Yet how many people, when engaging in a transaction, think of creating or retaining a document? [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 7:03 am
A New York Criminal Lawyer said that as the laws stand right now, the landmark case of Terry v Ohio, 1968 still remain the predicate for a stop of a person by a police officer. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
The court rejected that argument, saying that, while the Supreme Court ruling (in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
The case is Pecore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda Sutherland… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
As to preemption – hey wait, we thought this was summary judgment ? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
I'm not a lawyer, but unless the guidelines being developed require everyone to stay 50-60 feet from every arrest, that seems like a civil rights lawsuit waiting to happen.Russell pointed out that in many instances, the 50-60 foot rule would be impractical. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:19 pm
A case summary is the best way to illustrate the nuances of this type of coverage: In Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, LLP v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm
An unpublished decision also from the Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, entitled People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
In the American legal system, a plaintiff is entitled to a trial on patent infringement claims by a jury of laypersons—people not familiar with either the underlying technology or the complexities of the patent laws. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm
Chris Hansen, our senior First Amendment attorney, has been litigating First Amendment cases for many years, including landmark cases such as Reno v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm
Chris Hansen, our senior First Amendment attorney, has been litigating First Amendment cases for many years, including landmark cases such as Reno v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case of State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case of State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:19 am
State after state continue to restrict abortion rights seemingly guaranteed 40 years ago in Roe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
(Maryland v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
One view of fundamental values is that they exist in the ether waiting only to be discovered by the wise among us. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:57 am
” NAACP v. [read post]
