Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 3561 - 3580 of 72,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am by Robert Black
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:42 pm
ASIC argued that when people come forward to report matters to ASIC in confidence, their confidence should be respected where that is in the public interest. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:53 pm by Joseph Stacey
I am proud of our team and appreciative of all the people who helped us get here. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am by James Eckert
The Court of Appeals today, in People v Liden (#67) determined that an Article 78 proceeding is not the only valid way to challenge a determination by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that he must register as a sex offender.Ordinarily such a determination is a simple matter of reading the statute. [read post]