Search for: "Richard Doeing" Results 3561 - 3580 of 14,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 8:24 am by Christine Corcos
And what does work on interactions between the legal and literary imagination in other periods or cultures put in perspective for anglophone early modernists? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:24 am
And what does work on interactions between the legal and literary imagination in other periods or cultures put in perspective for anglophone early modernists? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that two Fourth Amendment decisions this term, in Byrd v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 8:10 pm
" For China, Jiang identifies the 19th CPC Congress as a memento of a great documentation--that is the registration or inscription, the leaving of a trace to be called up later (Maurizio Ferraris (2012) Documentality: Why It Is Necessary to Leave Traces (Commonalities) 1st Edition (Richard Davies, Translator)). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:31 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Toward a Civil Jury-Trial Default Rule Richard L. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
  The Trump phenomenon, of course, does nothing to enhance faith in democracy on the part of the left.) [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:56 am by Jim Sedor
The administration says Grogan did not need such a waiver because his government job does not overlap with what he did for Gilead. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:13 am by Kimberly Bishop
If the driver does not stop, this constitues a Class F Felony. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am by ASAD KHAN
Second, does the applicant have a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with the child? [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:43 pm
We’ve decided not to employ anyone who does not provide our clients, directly or indirectly, with any benefit. [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:12 pm
  They give him a random cellmate, a guy named Richard Brunton. [read post]
30 May 2018, 8:00 am by Rep. Adam Schiff
This does not mean that the FBI, like any institution, is beyond reproach. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia, in which the justices held 8-1 that the automobile exception to the warrant requirement does not permit a warrantless search of a motorcycle parked in the driveway of a home. [read post]