Search for: "SUITS v. STATE" Results 3561 - 3580 of 32,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 12:52 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled today in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 11:27 am
 It wants to make sure that it gets the answer right.But, at least to me, I have a pretty darn good sense of what the right answer is anyway.The relevant Oregon statute of limitations says that a products liability suit “must be commenced before the later of . . . ten years . . . or . . . the expiration of any statute of repose for an equivalent civil action in the state in which the product was manufactured. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We glean from the Court's analysis that the relevant inquiry is whether subjecting a state-created entity to suit in New York would offend that State's dignity as a sovereign. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We glean from the Court's analysis that the relevant inquiry is whether subjecting a state-created entity to suit in New York would offend that State's dignity as a sovereign. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 2:03 pm by richardhunt
In response professional plaintiffs and their lawyers have been, for several years, filing suit in New York’s state courts. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm by Unknown
Bailey Tool & Manufacturing (5th Cir. 3/10/14), plaintiff originally filed suit in state court alleging only violations of the Texas anti-discrimination statute. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:30 am by Florian Mueller
" The case no. is 21 O 13504/20, and the court scheduled a hearing for May 12.VoiceAge EVS is also enforcing patents in the United States, such as against Xiaomi. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:50 am by Eric Lipman
Which is why I found the "reverse paternity suit" far and away the most entertaining part of the LeBroncalypse. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Sandra Banning, the child’s mother, then filed a motion to intervene or dismiss, declaring that she had exclusive legal custody under a state-court order and that, as her daughter’s sole legal custodian, she felt it was not in the child’s interest to be a party to Newdow’s suit. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 8:50 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Last week, according to the Associated Press, a United States District Court for the Western District of Washington jury rejected her breach of contract claim in Hoang v. [read post]