Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 3561 - 3580 of 11,036
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The purposes of this privilege are to further the truth-seeking process at trial and encourage cooperation of witnesses, particularly with regard to expert witnesses, so that they can discharge their public duty freely “with knowledge that they will be insulated from the harassment and financial hazard of subsequent litigation” (Tolisano v Texon, 144 AD2d 267, 271 [1988, Smith, J., dissenting], revd for reasons stated in dissent 75 NY2d 732… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
After unsuccessfully appealing his conviction and pursuing state collateral review, Ayestas filed a federal habeas petition in 2009, raising a series of claims – including that, under Wiggins v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:15 am by Richard S. Zackin
The Court agreed with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ rationale in Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
Smith “did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons,” regardless of whether their marriages are same-sex or opposite sex. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am by Ben
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Trump v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm by Amy Howe
United States Monday, December 4 Christie v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm by Edith Roberts
United States Monday, December 4: Christie v. [read post]