Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 3561 - 3580 of 14,868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
Yet they took him to the precinct and wrote a false report stating that he was in criminal possession of a weapon. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:54 am by Nicholas Mosvick
On February 20, 1905, the Supreme Court, by a 7-2 majority, said in Jacobson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:27 am by Mark Tushnet
A concurring opinion published under Marshall's name in Williams v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Claim 1 of the patent as granted reads as follows:"A blade assembly (14) for a hair trimmer (10) having a trimmer body (18) and a motor, the blade assembly comprising;an upper blade (92) having a forward cutting edge (80);a lower blade (48) having a forward cutting edge (76) and defining a groove (104);a support member (60) configured for coupling to the trimmer body (18) and having a protrusion (96), wherein the protrusion is configured to be slidingly received in the groove… [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Richard L. Revesz
Supreme Court will soon hear argument on Seila Law v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by NCC Staff
America May Be Nearing the End of the Roe Era By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps looks at the Supreme Court’s upcoming abortion case, June Medical Services v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
  The first focused on the use of leverage against states through pressure from private actors. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm by Deepak Gupta
It’s that body of law that will come under the microscope on March 3, when the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:26 am by SHG
But the contrast to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Parents For Privacy v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Amy Teng
Amy Teng is an assistant attorney general in the Washington Attorney General’s Office, which joined 22 other states and the District of Columbia on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Such a requirement or condition, said the Appellate Division, "would undermine, erode, and emasculate the stated objective of this statute, which was designed to benefit the citizens of this state and the general commonweal, assure the public's right to be informed, and prevent secrecy by governmental bodies. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit, Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:33 am by Naomi Shatz
Today, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) hears oral argument in Commonwealth v. [read post]