Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3561 - 3580
of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
S. 319 (1976), which “evaluates (A) the private interest affected; (B) the risk of erroneous deprivation of that interest through the procedures used; and (C) the governmental interest at stake. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
TITLE V–GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Sec. 501. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
(CEQA Guidelines, § 15268(a)(c).). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
§§ 1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I), 1030(g); see WEC Carolina Energy Solutions LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
The court shall, however, revoke the nonresident's driving privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this State, in accordance with this section. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Uncommon LLC, No. 10 C 7764. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
The issues in the three cases are whether decisions of the Upper Tribunal can be subject to judicial review when: (a) there is no statutory right of appeal to the Court of Appeal (in the case of Cart); (b) there are ‘exceptional circumstances’ (in the case of Eba); and (c) the Queen’s Bench Division Administrative Court has determined that permission to appeal against the decision of the First Tier Tribunal may be reviewed on certain grounds (in… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Yesterday, while the rest of the country was locked in the grip of the commercial vortex that is St Valentine’s Day, Mr Justice Arnold was handing down a sonnet of his own in the form of an epic judgment in DataCard Corporation v Eagle Technologies Limited [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:40 am
PEREIRA v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:01 pm
In today’s case (Karpowicz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
Brief of Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
C & B Flooring Associates, LLC (29-CA-24357; 349 NLRB No. 66) Albertson, NY March 30, 2007. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
S. 114; Lockett v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Schwab's Behalf. ..................................................... 7 C. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Town terminating the plaintiff [Employee] based on the findings and recommendation of a disciplinary hearing officer, Supreme Court [a] denied the Town's motion to dismiss the Employee petition; [b] granted Employee's petition to the extent of annulling the penalty imposed; and [c] remitting the matter to the Town for the imposition of a less severe penalty. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Town terminating the plaintiff [Employee] based on the findings and recommendation of a disciplinary hearing officer, Supreme Court [a] denied the Town's motion to dismiss the Employee petition; [b] granted Employee's petition to the extent of annulling the penalty imposed; and [c] remitting the matter to the Town for the imposition of a less severe penalty. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
