Search for: "State v. Character" Results 3561 - 3580 of 7,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 2:20 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
The Court reasoned that the character of the money, although lawful at the moment of payment, changed on being paid into the bank accounts. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm by Patricia Salkin
Associate Director & Fellow at the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Flooding from Hurricane Katrina constitutes a taking of property without just compensation by the United States government, according to a recent decision from the United States Court of Federal Claims in Saint Bernard Parish Government, et al., v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:29 am by Tim Sitzmann
In the Board’s 2012 decision of Research in Motion Ltd. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Armellini v Austria (Judgment of 16 April 2015) the First Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 10 complaint by applicants who had been found guilty of defaming professional footballers by accusing them of taking bribes. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
And at this particular moment in time, commemorating the hundredth anniversary of the Los Angeles Aqueduct that would threaten the lake and the twentieth anniversary of the State Water Board’s ultimate decision to save it, the Mono Lake story is especially worth revisiting.Part II introduces the main cast of characters in the Mono Lake story, starting with the public trust and prior appropriations doctrines around which the legal controversy unfolds. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am by Joe Koncelik
 The Takings Clause of Article V of the United States Constitution states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
 You help close some cases.But it's a pretty heavy inroad into a pervasive surveillance state, eh? [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
For much of the rest of the world we must be the focus of bitter amusement, characters in a satire we don’t understand. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm by Joseph Grodin
Thirteen years ago this tension came before the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]