Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Raghubir Singh, (1989) 2 SCC 754, the Court had suggested that for the purpose of imparting certainty and authority to the judgement of the Supreme Court, it would be preferable if all judgements are rendered by Division Benches of at least three Judges unless it is not conveniently possible for compelling reasons.A classic example is Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
[19] I’ve included in the handouts the risk assessment and safety plans that I use with my clients. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:02 pm
An Appeal was then made to the Arizona Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
I think the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division decision in Kendall v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:57 am
One of those cases culminated in a recent decision by the Manhattan-based Appellate Division – First Department, Max v ALP, Inc., 203 AD3d 580 [1st Dept 2022], in which the Court brought to conclusion a putative shareholder derivative lawsuit Adam brought against Libra in 2019, which Justice Bannon dismissed in full, the dismissal of which the appeals court then affirmed in full. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
In 2006, the last year for which data was available, the corresponding percentage in state courts was 94. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
Morelli, decided Friday by the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Zarnoch, joined by Judges Friedman and Gould: In her decision, the Arbitrator, retired Court of Appeals Judge Irma S. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
A majority of the Court had made clear, seven years ago in Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am
WIAL's Notice of Arbitration mentions the court's advice of its inclination to dismiss the petition as the reason for its withdrawal.10.03.03: Application by WIAL (GA 934/2003) before the Calcutta High Court to dismiss AP No. 290/2002.27.11.03: GA 934/2003 was rejected by a Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court (judgement)15.12.03: Appeal filed APOT 719/2003 from the decision of the Single Judge in GA 934/200307.05.04: Appeal APOT… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:48 am
I doubt we can sidestep the honest-belief rule so easily. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The court's decision, by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Ira B. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
He obviously has a perspective of his own on the underlying issues — he was, for instance, a forceful critic of the Court’s Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:28 pm
The court relied on Order 10 rule 14 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 1976[9] and discountenanced the contention of the appellant that the Federal High Court is one court and no leave of court is required to issue and serve a court process in one judicial division of the court (i.e. in one State) for service in another State. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:38 pm
The closest constitutional challenge to the PTAB was probably in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
These 10 pledges included “(2) I will support data protection and privacy legislation”, “(5) I will not support blanket, unchecked surveillance measures”, “(6) I will promote online anonymity and encryption”, and “(8) I will support export controls of surveillance and censorship technology” Statements in Open Court and Apologies There were no statements in open court last… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
