Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
In House v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:59 pm
Hedgepath v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Michigan) Petition for certiorari Docket: 09-110 Title: HCA, Inc. et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:44 pm
Alegre (September 23, 2009), authored by the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Two). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:39 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:43 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
I. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:05 am
PBA v Collins, USDC SDNY, 97CIV7827Burns v Collins, NYS Supreme Court, 258 A.D.2d 692Anyone familiar with police and fire disability issues in New York State is aware that the finances of many municipal governments are strained by the obligation to pay disability benefits to injured fire and police officers while at the same time maintaining public safety services with able-bodied personnel. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:01 pm
(September 21, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) examined whether the federal law "Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing Act of 2003" (tit. 15, U.S.C, § 7701 et seq.) [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
Department of Justice, Civil Division, has filed its motion to dismiss in Gill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:06 am
Supreme Court case, Kelo v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:32 pm
Today, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) offers a reminder that such a choice can have substantial consequences, holding, in Las Lomas Land Company, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:45 am
State Supreme Court Justice Belen dismissed Jardim's complaint commenting that "[i]t is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate in a court of law. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
When Arizona’s Court of Appeals, Division Two came out with a related opinion in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:12 pm
On appeal, the Appellate Division held that the ordering of a $500 sanction for each future violation was "premature". [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
The California Court of Appeal (Fourth District, Division Two) issued this unpublished opinion last week, reducing a punitive damages award from $750,000 to $150,000 in a case involving $15,000 in compensatory damages. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Second District, Division Three) issued this unpublished opinion today, affirming a $2 million punitive damages award. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:18 pm
(State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
""Nonetheless," said the court, "we are constrained by the Court of Appeals' decisions in Matter of Waldren v Town of Islip (6 NY3d 735), and Pell v Board (34 NY2d 222) not to disturb the UFSD's determination, as it cannot be said as a matter of law that the penalty imposed on the petitioner herein, termination, is ‘so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:13 pm
State v. [read post]
