Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2010, 9:57 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday announced that they would take up the matter of Tivo, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 April 2016. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
” Justice DeWine to defense counsel On February 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, Case No. 10-290, a case that calls into question what the proper burden of proof is to invalidate a patent claim. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:45 am
Little help expected from SCOTUSCoincidentally, the US Supreme Court yesterday heard oral arguments on eyewitness procedures, though SCOTUSBlog reports that "the Court very likely will decide this case, Perry v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:20 am
The same evening he was heard by a judge, convicted as charged, and sentenced to three days’ detention. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:27 am
State of Florida, heard recently by the Florida Supreme Court, his death sentence was overturned due to lack of adequate counsel. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), a U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
Similarly, if Haywood had sought declaratory or injunctive relief against a correction officer, that suit would be heard in a state supreme court. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 3:25 pm
The “big” admin case heard this past week, in terms of general media interest, was Don’t Waste Michigan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 7:13 pm
In Howard v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
"This was one of the first requests for fees filed after the Supreme Court ruling inKirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:52 am
This case fails as well.The case is Balentine v. [read post]
