Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
App. 542, 411 S.E.2d 718 (1991), Tompkins State Bank v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
Commissioner, 853 F.2d 1494 (9th Cir 1988), Dancy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
FEC, McCutcheon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
A smiling TV 2 Norway (new owner of C More) CEO possibly pictured before the CJEU rulingLast week this blog reported on the latest decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public within Article 3 of the InfoSoc Directive, this being C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, C-279/13.BackgroundAs readers will remember, this was yet another reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Late in the March term, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Brunton v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm
When too much leverage is given to right holders (especially those whose patents are dubious), IP becomes a substitute for innovation, and a threat to true innovators. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is what Jaime tells us:Trademark trolls and trade mark hijacking in CubaThe start of negotiations and eventual opening of commercial relations between Cuba and United States is tempting some individuals to jump at the chance to register US trade marks in order to force trade mark holders to negotiate their entrance into the Cuban market. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 11:16 am
Holder, Jr. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:26 pm
Holder, the Supreme... [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:45 am
First up is Kimble v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
Line Material Co. (1948), along with United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am
In the 2014 case of Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
Loan Payment Administration LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Do Process LP v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the local government and two police officers in San Francisco v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
BILLS THAT PASSED House Bill 25: Application RevisionsRepresentative V. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus is on the process… [read post]
