Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 11,546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
Main Request, Rule 111(2) EPC2.1 At the time when the contested decision was issued, the requirements for issuing a refusal using a standard form referring to previous communications were set out in the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, November 2016, C-V, 15.2.According to the first paragraph of Guideline C-V, 15.2, in order to comply with the requirement that a decision be reasoned (Rule 111(2)), it is only possible to use this form of decision where the previous… [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:05 pm
Benson v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
Sorensen for failure to state a claim. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
Sorensen for failure to state a claim. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Knick v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Knick v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States, Pam Karlan in Lozman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The Supreme Court chose to refer this question to the CJEU, which replied in a decision of the 26 February 2015 (C-41/14 – Christie’s France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaries, see previous post here). [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:32 pm
While it is not precedential, in State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:56 am
Just before his arrest, in Simpson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm
Mayflower Cambridge Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1975) 30 P & CR 28 was a planning case, concerning hotel use. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 8:27 am
Additional Resources: Zuckerman v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:50 am
” Woodward v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:06 am
The three main arguments presented by the Supreme Court in favour of the interim injunctions are as follows: The injunctions should be proportionate to the relief sought by the plaintiff. [read post]
