Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 3561 - 3580 of 45,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2024, 2:45 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday sent a challenge to a Pennsylvania law barring people 18- to 20-years-old from carrying guns back to the lower courts for another look in light of last term’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
The certificate also incorrectly stated that the conviction followed a jury trial. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
In a TED talk, Kahneman nicely illustrates his central thesis that anticipated memories of experiences as opposed to the actual anticipated experiences themselves motivate people’s behavior by stating that very frequently and to a large degree people take vacations in service of their remembering selves. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm by Unknown
Cranford (Reserved Water Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPamela J. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:59 pm by Ilya Somin
  Today, Texas state trial Judge David Peeples issued a decision in Van Stean v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:14 am by admin
A few resources may be contacting your state bar association, The General Bar, the CLLA, or simply ask a local business or two who they recommend. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
When an appellant successfully challenges a conviction which followed a trial, the imposition of an increased sentence after a retrial is presumed to violate the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution, even where the retrial is before a different judge than imposed the original sentence (People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 158 [1990]). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by William Melater
Turns out, however, that a lot of people not only eat Tagalongs, but people speak Tagalog in the Philippines. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
Attorney Preet Bharara has filed a 53-page complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, United States of America v Carl Kruger, Richard Lipsky, Aaron Malinski, Solomon Kalish, Robert Aquino, David Rosen, William Boyland, Jr. and Michael Turano, alleging violations of 18 USC §§1341, 1343, 1346, 1349, and 1956(a)(1)(B) and (h).In a press release issued March 10, 2011, concerning the complaint, Governor Cuomo said:"Today's… [read post]