Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 3561 - 3580 of 57,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
After Monday's ruling, the state is still determining what action to take. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm by Heidi Meinzer
The agreement's stated purpose was to resolve a dispute over the width of Norfolk and Western’s right of way, and said that the Whites were conveying an eighty-foot wide right of way through their farm. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am by Guest Author
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
You've got to be a monster civil procedure geek to read nearly twenty single-spaced pages about what Congress meant when it said that, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, national banks are deemed to be “citizens of the States in which they are respectively located. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm
  High Desert State Prison -- where he's currently incarcerated -- seems about the right place for him. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:55 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
He was sentenced to 10 years in prison, the maximum term allowed by state law. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
The trial court said that it was "very, very troubled" by the events that transpired in this class action case, stating that he thought that "[i]t appears to me [that] there has been egregious misconduct and bad faith on the part of ILG [Initiative Law Group]. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The justices said “no” in 1983 but then said “yes” in 1992. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:28 am by Jeffrey D. Polsky
Concepcion said that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that “stand[] as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purpose and objectives of [the FAA]. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm
  The Constitution says that in criminal actions, venue is proper only "in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed," but that if the crime was “not committed within any State . . . the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 2:47 pm
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently held in Levitt Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 2:03 am by Michael DelSignore
With hearsay testimony, the right to cross examine the witness would be gone as it is simply somebody else stating what was said and for this reason is unconstitutional. [read post]