Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 4,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2025, 10:31 pm
., Andersen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:46 pm
Vázquez-Salceda et al. (2008). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 12:52 pm
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:10 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
19 May 2018, 3:17 pm
In D.V. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm
Although a treaty generally cannot itself establish a Federal criminal offense, see, e.g., Hopson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
NCSLT Litigation Moratorium? – Expect confusion, inconsistent implementation, and need for follow-up
22 Sep 2017, 2:27 pm
Much rather, the implementation and impact will necessarily differ from state to state because lawsuits cannot necessarily just be put on hold unilaterally. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
Suspecting that the goods were fake, HMRC sent samples to Nokia, which confirmed that the goods were indeed fake and asked HMRC to detain the consignment. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:35 pm
Bhavilav v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:02 am
” Dumpson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
” All rights in preferred stock provisions, even if considered standard or customary, must be “expressly and clearly stated. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 8:04 pm
Other examples of remedial efforts taken too far include Justice Zucker’s decision last year in R. v. [read post]
