Search for: "State v. So" Results 3561 - 3580 of 117,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:33 am
Pangloss should not be so flippant or indeed, so late.The HL Constitutional Committee issued a Call for Evidence in late April on "the impact that government surveillance and data collection have upon the privacy of citizens and their relationship with the State. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
We've been asked two questions repeatedly since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:07 pm by Kyle Graham
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:55 pm
  However, the court reversed the district court's finding of contempt because the challenged conduct, filing a new ANDA seeking to sell another generic version of divalproex, was not within the literal scope of the original injunction, as it was not one of the enumerated actions.More detail of Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
This is particularly so in the case of counsel becoming involved at a later stage of the claim. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:21 am by Peter Margulies
The long course of dealing between the State Department and these agencies is so well-developed that the agencies have a nickname in the trade: “volags” (volunteer agencies). [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case decided by the New York State Court of Appeals, the judges find that the police were allowed to conduct a limited protective search this guy's car because they reasonably thought the car had weapons.The case is People v. [read post]