Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 5,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2011, 1:11 pm
" The Bail Reform Act of 1984 required courts to detain individuals, without bail, that had been charged with certain serious felonies provided that the government could demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that no release conditions could reasonably ensure the safety of other people and the community.This act also provides arrestees with the right to request counsel, to present witnesses and to cross examine the government's witnesses. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:40 am
Under WestJest’s new UltraBasic fare tier, you can’t bring a carry-on bag unless your flight is crossing an ocean. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm
See, Lewis v Dollar Rent A Car and ESIS WC Claims (Opinion filed June 9, 2017). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:40 am
Colb In my column for this week, I discuss the recent case of Ontario v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Yet in one recent Michigan worker's compensation opinion, Sunitha Atluri v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:40 am
The hearings will occur in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's pending decision in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
I asked, if insurers were to move towards increased use of arbitration following AT&T v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday we filed a friend-of-the-court brief in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm
Premature extradition: EAWs are only supposed to be used to extradite people to serve prison sentences or be prosecuted. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am
While the prosecutor was cross-examining Mr. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:35 am
Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:00 am
Supreme Court case called Elonis v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 3:55 am
The first Ollman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 4:32 pm
The cases are _____ v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Because a technical background is required for patent prosecution, perhaps “hard IP” implicitly cross-references “hard sciences. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 5:47 am
Graham v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:50 am
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:52 pm
In Caplan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
(There is also a requirement that the people concerned have to be personally connected, which is defined. [read post]
