Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 3561 - 3580 of 6,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am by Mark Walsh
People might regard my opinions as dull, rather boring. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm by Shea Denning
  My experience suggests that many, many people do not know about, or possibly know, but do not care to comply with, this rule. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:54 am
On Tuesday, a divided Supreme Court upheld the Environmental Protection Agency’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm by Roy Black
Rarely do I read any textbooks or law review articles on cross. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
This logic would allow the state to aid Klan members to display a burning cross to harass someone who donates to the NAACP, because the great majority of people now oppose racism. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Melchert-Dinkel Backpage Gets Important 47 USC 230 Win Against Washington Law Trying to Combat Online Prostitution Ads (Forbes Cross-Post & More) Banning Sex Offenders from Social Networking Sites is Unconstitutional–Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is settled that an accused's right to cross-examine witnesses and present a criminal defense is not absolute nor can the Sixth Amendment be read to "confer the right to present testimony free from the legitimate demands of the adversarial system as ruled in United States v Nobles and Michigan v Lucas. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:55 am by David Gans
  This post is cross-posted at Text and History. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 6:38 am
The Federal Court of Appeal has upheld a Federal Court decision that declared Métis people to be Indians as per the Constitution. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
The court ruled that such concerns were best tested by “[v]igorous cross- examination [and] presentation of contrary evidence,” not by its wholesale preclusion. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Indeed, vigorous cross-examination of the bank’s witnesses made it plausible for the jury to infer that the bank’s reasons for firing her were pretextual. [read post]