Search for: "United States v. West"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 4,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:53 am
Singhal v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
The OA articles in this listing were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 January 2021.Bronze OA:"An Analysis of the ECtHR Judgment in the Case of N.D. and N.T. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am
” The United States has finalized a 25-year agreement with Australia that will double the number of American troops training with Australian security forces, according to Defense One. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
However, some states outsource the editorial operations to legal publishers such as LexisNexis and West Publishing Co. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Turning to the pleadings, the Court found that the plaintiff had failed to plead a class whose members had claims united by common questions of law and fact – the “commonality” requirement. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
In fact, I can state the unequivocal belief that that day would absolutely never come. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:48 am
192/18, Commission v Poland; C? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
” See FCC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 9:30 am
This is especially true given surveys which show how prevalent drowsy driving is in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:30 am
This is especially true given surveys which show how prevalent drowsy driving is in the United States. [read post]
