Search for: "White v. White" Results 3561 - 3580 of 16,608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
 For example, the central juror at issue was one that the prosecutor thought was white. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm
Someone can look at two entirely similar people/jurors and while one of them -- the white/majority/male one -- might seem "fine, even though a bit overly confident for my own tastes," it's distinctly possible for that same person to view a quite-similarly-situated minority/female juror (or person) as "aggressive" or "uppity" or "hostile". [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 158403, Sept. 23, 2013) and dismissed an inmate's complaint that several of his religious books were confiscated as contraband because he did not have his name written in them.In White v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:54 am
White Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) Filed: March 12, 2008 Macrovision Corporation v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
She had accessed the Bakersfield Police Department computer in reference to the White Lords of Bakersfield, a group that had written about how they were going to lock up colored people using the MDO program to incarcerate innocent people. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: Keyword Advertising 3d render concept with blue and white arrows flying over a white background // ShutterStockIf you’ve been keeping up with the blog over the past several years, you already know that competitive keyword advertising lawsuits consistently lose in court. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
This was reiterated in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
This was reiterated in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 1:21 am
This has always happened (irrespective of the White v White 'yardstick of equality of division'), and always will. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 8:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada described this in Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. [read post]