Search for: "Witt"
Results 3561 - 3580
of 4,101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2010, 6:26 pm
Wittes and Chesney casually dismiss this argument. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 11:31 am
Witt. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:10 am
In the interest of highlighting two significant trees in a fairly dense forest (and in light of the various intervening exchanges between me and Ben Wittes, Bobby Chesney, and Peter Margulies; and the speech Senator Graham is apparently set to give tomorrow at the American Enterprise Institute), I wanted to focus more specifically on the heart of the problem--i.e., why the substantive detention authority provided by the bill is so troubling (Gabor Rona from Human Rights First… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:57 pm
Witt on the cover. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:55 pm
I would not be surprised if the court ultimately agrees with Wittes. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:05 pm
Witt. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:53 am
Just off the top of my head — I am probably forgetting some: Lawfare (the new Wittes-Chesney-Goldsmith national security law blog); EJILTalk (blog of the European Journal of International Law); Larry Solum’s Legal Theory Blog; Balkinization; Truth on the Market; Concurring Opinions; The Conglomerate; Bainbridge; The Faculty Lounge; International Law Reporter. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 3:11 pm
Witt and Lt. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
Margaret Witt, a decorated U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:41 pm
Not surprisingly, my rather harsh criticism of the Graham bill in this post from Sunday morning has provoked a series of reactions from its defenders over at Lawfare (for what it's worth, this is my favorite thing about blogging--meaningful substantive disagreements fleshed out over time). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
Margaret Witt, a decorated U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 11:37 pm
., this one) by Ben Wittes on the Graham bill (on which he consulted) over at “Lawfare. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:18 pm
Witt's behalf. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 4:50 am
Over at the new "Lawfare" blog, Ben Wittes has a post up outlining some objections to the media's increasingly common use of the Guantanamo "scorecard"--the unofficial tally of the 50-something post-Boumediene detainee habeas cases that have thus far been adjudicated on the merits. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:48 am
I agree with the fundamentals of the editorial; so does Ben Wittes, commenting at the new — and I suspect soon to be indispensable — national security blog, Lawfare. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:52 am
by Kevin Jon Heller Ben Wittes calls attention today to a Washington Post editorial defending the targeted killing of American citizens like Al-Aulaqi: [W]hen a target is hiding in a lawless state or in one which refuses to cooperate in his apprehension, other alternatives must be considered, including targeted strikes. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
UPDATE 2: Wittes has responded to my post. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) Three important voices in national security law — Jack Goldsmith, Bobby Chesney, and Benjamin Wittes — have launched a new blog: LAWFARE: Hard National Security Choices. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:03 pm
. . . to Lawfare: Hard National Security Choices by Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:53 pm
Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes just launched an exciting new blog entitled "Lawfare: Hard National Security Choices" or The Lawfare Blog for short (my shortening). [read post]
