Search for: "**jackson v. Long" Results 341 - 360 of 2,205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 5:00 am by K.O. Herston
” The first week has us in Memphis, Jackson, and my hometown of Nashville. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm by Michael Froomkin
There are six candidates for Coral Gables Commission Group V, so it will not take many votes to get a win in what has recently been a low-turnout election. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
The fact is that I have long relied on the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:32 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, following the addition of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who must recuse herself from the Harvard case because she served on the university’s board of overseers, the two cases were decoupled so that Justice Jackson may consider the University of North Carolina dispute. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:26 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court has now granted certiorari in two cases challenging the continued viability of its long-standing decision in Chevron v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) to hold that abortion rights were not protected under the Equal Protection Clause.During that same term in 1974, however, the Court did hold in Cleveland Board of Education v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:14 am by Michael Fox
In a narrow sense, that is the substance of  today's 5-4 decision in Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
I suppose that is the point - anti-Americanism, anti-Bushism, and increasingly anti-Jewism do not offend left-liberal elite sensibilities - Hitler does not offend left-liberal elite sensibility, so long as it is framed as "dialogue" and "debate. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:25 pm by Stephen Halbrook
[The real dissents are the concurrences by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson.] [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]