Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 341 - 360 of 7,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  “That SJS/TEN may be more predictable in the future if a particular discovery is made says nothing about Defendants’ negligence. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
What does it take to win a retaliation claim under the employment discrimination laws? [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury awarded plaintiff a dollar in nominal damages and $150,000 in punitive damages, to be split 50-50 among the two defendants. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 10:32 am by Chamlin, Rosen, Uliano & Witherington
N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 provides in pertinent part: "A person who operates a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor...or operates a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10% or more by weight of alcohol in defendant's blood...shall be subject [to certain enunciated penalties](emphasis added). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
In his judgment, Daniel Alexander QC added: ‘... overall, the sum I am awarding provides a reasonable sum by way of costs to the Claimant (it is about 50% of its total costs ignoring photocopying) but it does not unjustly penalize the Defendant by awarding full costs against it, having regard to their offer’. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:31 am by Russell Knight
Illinois divorce courts do not split a divorcing couples’ assets 50/50 to each party. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
Thus, the complaint does not state a cognizable cause of action to recover damages for invasion of privacy. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:16 am
Defendants have movedto dismiss the complaint with prejudice.Defendants are arguing that the parts of GTAV where “Lacey Jonas” does appear are not advertising or trade, but is instead an artistic work, and thus out of the scope of New York right of publicity law. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Defendants argued that the letter does not allow the jury to infer unlawful intent to discriminate, but the jury could draw different conclusions about defendants' motives from the content of the letter. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:07 am by Katherine Gallo
  In other words, if you are relying on another party’s expert (i.e., a co-defendant) you must still furnish an expert witness declaration for that expert. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 4:28 pm by Hanlon Law, PA
Case Setting It is alleged that the defendant was charged with conspiring to distribute and distributing 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
New York’s Statutory Right to PrivacyNew York State does not does not recognize a common-law right of privacy, and its only privacy statute,  New York Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51, is a right of publicity statute. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:54 am by Matthew Hill
Morgan J considered that this duty would still have applied at the date of the trial if this information had continued to be confidential (para. 50). [read post]