Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 341 - 360
of 11,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeals will likely re-examine its holding in Gross v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:22 am
Continue reading [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:25 am
To recap, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) examined the validity of the decision in Alvarez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:05 pm
Today, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) reversed an Examiner's 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:02 am
The Appeal Court allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 11:01 am
The applicant filed an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) to refuse its patent application. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:09 pm
Continue reading [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 2.Toronto Dominion Bank v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
The General Court did not examine the sign in its entirety, but merely based that examination on a random combination of the colours light grey and traffic-light red. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
The Court of Appeals found no error. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
Read the Federal Register notice announcing the implementation of Track One here. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
Read the Federal Register notice announcing the implementation of Track One here. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
In Sharda Devi, the Court pointed out that in South Asia Industries, the Court had examined sections 39 and 43 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and held that a combined reading of the two sections showed that an order passed by the High Court in an appeal under section 39 was to be final. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Continue reading [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Continue reading [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:54 pm
Please remember as you read this (you can read the entire opinion here) that this guy wants to be a lawyer, and was rejected by the New Mexico Board of Bar Examiners. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:03 am
The Examiner took the position that the claimed "metal alloy" read on both. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:58 am
The Applicant argued that the Examiner had interpreted geometric features shown in the reference drawings in an arbitrary manner, in order to read on the claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 2:25 pm
The Applicant argued that the Examiner had interpreted geometric features shown in the reference drawings in an arbitrary manner, in order to read on the claims. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:15 am
The PTO instituted the pilot program because of the popularity of its Track I Prioritized Examination Program for patent applications. [read post]
